Friday, November 2, 2012

THE OVERRIDING DOWNTURN IN THE RECENT PAST

THOUGH LATIN AMERICAN ECONOMIES LIKE ARGENTINA, VENEZUELA AND COLOMBIA HAVE SHOWN SOME RESILIENCE AGAINST THE OVERRIDING DOWNTURN IN THE RECENT PAST. BUT, WITH HUGE SOVEREIGN DEBTS AND THEIR GROWING INCAPABILITY TO SERVICE THEM AT A STANDARD RATE, THEY STILL STAND ON THE VERGE OF COLLAPSE, FEELS MANISH K. PANDEY…

For most countries, tolerating a short-term deficit to stimulate the economy is a reasonable tradeoff. But, for Argentina, however, the picture is complicated by the country’s limited access to foreign capital as it has been in default since 2001. Though Christina’s predecessor, her husband Nestor Kirchner had restructured most of the debt and even repaid money borrowed from IMF, Argentina still remains in default of over $20 billion of debt from its 2005 restructuring and over $6 billion in Paris Club debt. Worse, Argentina’s total debt, not counting that held by the holdouts, as of today stands at $140 billion (almost 50% of GDP)!

The Argentine government has also been questioned by analysts on the validity of certain economic indicators, which the government is reported to have skewed seemingly to get a favourable market standing. For instance, inflation has been ‘officially’ hovering around 9% since 2006. But it was privately estimated at 12-15% that year and over 15% in 2008. All this has led to a scenario where investors are left with little (or say no) faith on the Argentine government. According to Argentina’s central bank, capital flight from the country has reached $5.5 billion in Q2 2009, bringing a total of $11.2 billion in H1 2009. In fact, since 2007, capital flight has reached about $43 billion on worries over its economic outlook. Economist Rodrigo Alvarez from consultants Ecolatina, warns that capital flight from Argentina has reached levels similar to those of 2001. In his view, the government needs to restore confidence before it’s too late. Even as per Morgan Stanley analysts, Argentina’s fiscal accounts are moving toward deficits, which will likely increase worries on fiscal sustainability and “the country’s ability to honour its debt service obligations.” Considering this they have even lowered their “forecasts for Argentina’s fiscal balance to -0.6% of GDP (from 0.0%) for 2009 and -0.9% of GDP (from -0.4%) for 2010.”

The scenario is somewhat similar in Venezuela where high levels of government spending and unorthodox economic policies are catching up very fast. In fact, the country’s GDP has already fallen by 4.5% in Q2 2009, following a 2.4% decline in the first quarter.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Thursday, November 1, 2012

GOLDMAN SACHS: LESSONS OF SUCCESS

You could call Goldman Sachs the greatest market manipulator and cry foul at every announcement that it makes. Yet, in an unrivalled environment, the best option is to learn from the Alpha male of Wall Street – the brat of the whole lot! by gyanendra kashyap

Despite widespread criticisms, Goldman Sachs'' share price has marked a 240% rise in just a year (touching $176.51 as on November 10, 2009). As a matter of fact, during Q3, 2009 alone, the firm made profits of more than $100 million on trading revenues in 36 days and profits of more than $50 million in 53 of the 65 trading days – all these, when financial institutions were still scrambling for schlock bankruptcy covers (the latest victim being CIT). So what gives at Goldman that makes it so different from its peers?

Peter Nerby, New York-based analyst at Moody’s Investors Service communicates to us that the superior performance of Goldman Sachs over its peers is based on the "firm''s risk management expertise and controls, as well as the strength and diversification of its franchises." Although that is simply put, the statement does contain the very foundation of the spectacular success of how Chairman Lloyd has managed his firm. But his success has been supported by three strategic focuses he used over the past few years.

Yes, to some extent, Blankfein has benefited from the miasmal state of affairs of his competitors, who were forced to wrestle with large trading losses and internal restructuring. A less competitive market and higher fees have indeed contributed to the staggering profit figures (revenues and profits, in this industry, are a function of volumes and margins). David Viniar, CFO of Goldman Sachs, while angrily denouncing several allegations levelled against Sachs (he termed the accusations an egregious distortion of facts), has gone on record saying, "We are very aware of what''s going on in the world, but we have to trade that off with being fair to our people who, we believe, have performed admirably throughout the crisis."

And this is precisely the first learning for other banks – treat criticism as hyperbole and reward your top performers, blasphemously (if that means obtaining a scurrilous reputation, so be it), for "people" surely are the topmost tangible asset. Competitors like Morgan Stanley, who have lost talent regularly since the mid 90s and have had to pay out billions of dollars to settle lawsuits/issues in the past years, have never managed to match the sparkle of Sachs to an extent (for records, Mika Watanbe, Executive Director, Morgan Stanley, communicated to B&E his refusal to comment on the issue). 


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012. An Initiative of IIPMMalay Chaudhuri
and Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist).

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.
 
Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….

IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global

Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman
IIPM B-School Facebook Page
IIPM Global Exposure
IIPM Best B School India
IIPM B-School Detail

IIPM Links  
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

WHY DO THEY DISLIKE INDIA?

The governments of Pakistan, China, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan and Bangladesh reveal to akram hoque of B&E...

Nehru’s dreams started unraveling in 1947 itself when the founder of modern Burma, Aang San was assassinated and Indians were forced to leave everything and flee. By the winter of 1948, Nehru had got a first taste of jihad in Kashmir, a jihad that now threatens to debilitate India even as it destroys Pakistan. Two more shocks awaited Nehru and his vision of a peaceful and comradely South Asia in 1959. The leader of Sri Lanka, Solomon Bandarnaike was assassinated and the genie of anti-Tamil policies uncorked; the resultant civil war has just about reached a lull. And of course, China annexed Tibet, claiming it was always a part of China, forcing the Dalai Lama to flee and get exile in India. By 1962, when the Chinese military humiliated India, Nehru’s dreams of a ‘friendly’ neighbourhood were utterly and completely demolished. Since then, India has simply not been able to forge really close and friendly ties with the people and governments of its neighbours.

Let’s face it. No matter how many times Sonia Gandhi and Manmohan Singh stand in front of the mirror and ask “who is the fairest of them all?”, the fact is that India is not very popular in the neighbourhood. Perhaps the only saving grace is that it is usually the governments of these neighbouring countries that are more hostile towards India than their citizens. For Nepal, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, India is the Big Brother and Bully that has a nasty habit of throwing tantrums and throwing its weight around. For Pakistan - or at least a large part of the ruling establishment in Pakistan - India is the Eternal Enemy that defines the existential rationale for the nation state. For China, India is a ‘hegemonistic’ upstart that needs to be taught a lesson every now and then. Why, even Bhutan has problems with India.

This is particularly galling for Indians and Indian policy makers. India is a unique country amongst major powers - including Japan, China, Russia, Germany, France, Britain and the United States - that has never invaded a neighbour. India is the only country amongst major powers that has actually ‘lost’ homeland territory in the last 100 years. India is known for its unique culture of tolerance, co-existence, respect for all religions and openness to new ideas and identities. And yet, why is it that people and governments in Sri Lanka, Nepal and Bangladesh think that India is a Big Bully which threatens their very existence? Somewhere deep down, Indians are downright offended by the very notion that India can play the Big Bully against any country. And yet, the perceptions persist...


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

A circus clown called Pravda!

Putin’s mouthpiece is a flabbergasting piece of shambles

Oh, what all it could have achieved; and look at where it has ended. To say that the Russian government’s official mouthpiece (former, they claim), Pravda, has descended into becoming a ludicrous two crap piece of dimwit news creation, is to state only the tip of the Kremlin iceberg. There has been a lot of talk about Vladimir Lenin’s legacy. It requires no reiteration to praise his role in the development and progress of the Soviet Union. When it came to the Pravda of old, he left no stone unturned to take it to new heights and to make sure that it echoed the voice of the nation. Pravda used to follow Lenin’s editorial stance regularly and voiced what came to be known as Leninism. It was actually after the October Revolution of 1917 that Pravda started selling nearly 100,000 copies daily. Pravda expectably became an official publication of the Soviet Communist Party and a channel for announcing official policy. Decades – and many Soviet premiers – later, it fills one with sadness to see the pathetic state that Pravda has been left in. Sample a few of its breaking news.

On September 24, 2009, Pravda published news (and last month uploaded explicit videos too!) that featured a Russian based US diplomat Kyle Hatcher cavorting pleasurably with prostitutes. US Ambassador to Russia, John Beyrle, defended and clarified that the tape was “clearly fabricated.” As per Beyrle, “the video spliced genuine footage of diplomat Kyle Hatcher in a Moscow hotel room with staged footage of a couple having sex.” The attempt to frame Kyle seemed so ludicrous it could well have been managed by a high school kid. But then, this kind of zany tragicomic news is no stranger to Pravda. Take this multi-part series they had on the topic of sex in 2007. On April 18, 2007, Pravda presented their own version of a juiced up adultery survey on various countries. Fair enough. But six day later, the paper published news on sex museums, following the same within a week with a detailed report on how “future technologies may destroy sex as the ultimate pleasure for humans.” On May 7, 2007, the editorial team came out with a deeply thought review of breasts – about how various media outlets portray breasts differently.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

 

Monday, October 29, 2012

Rich dad, poor dad

Barack just needs to look to his neighbours to understand health policies

That America has not done as well in supporting health issues over the years is a given fact. But how bad is ‘not done as well’? The answer is pretty bad. Not many would know that in the US, the incidence of cancer among males and females is 562.3 and 417.3 per 1,00,000 respectively (American Cancer Society, Surveillance and Health Policy Research, 2009), life expectancy is 77.8 years, infant mortality rate is 6.9 deaths per 1,000 live births (CNN once reported that the US has the second worst newborn death rate in the modern world), mortality rate under the age of five years for males and females is 9 and 7 per 1,000 live births respectively, only 2.7 acute care beds per 1,000 people are available (5th worst amongst all OECD nations), 2.8 physicians per 1,000 and ranks 72nd by overall level of health on WHO parameters!

Perhaps today, the biggest issue in the US is the failure of its healthcare system, especially given the debate on Obama’s policy decisions. Though Obama is not labelled a failure, yet when it comes to healthcare reforms, it might not take too long for his 300+ million supporters to ‘change’ their point-of-view. One need not travel miles to prove what ails the States. Their next door neighbour – Canada – is a case in point, or rather, against the point. Canada has a healthcare model that is better; because it works!

Even after having a US-like healthcare model, Canada has successfully achieved better results in its healthcare report card. Healthcare spending in Canada is around $160 billion or 10.1% of its GDP in 2007, which is one percentage point higher than the average spending by OECD countries. But very interestingly, it is far lower than the US allocation, which is 16% of GDP. Canada also spends lesser on a per capita basis compared to the US. Canada’s total healthcare per capita spending was around $3,895, which is lower than the $7,290 per capita spending of the US. The critical reason why the system, despite spending less, works better in Canada is that while the public sector is the main source of funding for Canadian healthcare, the US system is dependent on private source funding.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Saturday, October 27, 2012

ONGC has to still find a way to beat the oil volatility cycle without the help of subsidies, says ratan bhagat

One has to realise that ONGC’s profits actually registered a 3% yoy decline. One top expert in the industry tells us that ONGC’s small, yet visible decline could primarily be attributed to “the subsidy burden and higher DD&A [depreciation, depletion and amortization] expenditure during the quarter and 8.1% decline in crude oil sales volumes.” And oil price volatility has been killing in the past few quarters. But if the government taketh, the government giveth too – for the subsidies that the government provides ONGC hover at the top of critics’ radars. CMD R.S.Sharma accepts, “The volatility in the crude oil prices has definitely affected ONGC, but its impact for us is not as severe, as the company is hedged against it, given the current subsidy practices of the government which neutralises the major chunk of the price volatility.”

Mere government support and the titular Navratna status can only get one so far. Ergo, one has to accept that ONGC must have done some great things to become Asia’s largest oil and gas explorer, a continent which has intense competition from countries like China and Australia, which have companies like China National Petroleum and BHP Billiton that are placed four hundred odd ranks above ONGC on the Fortune 500 list globally. But the future is where Sharma is playing the roulette game. One has to realise that for decades, ONGC has basically been an upstream oil and gas company, that is, it has focused more on oil and gas drilling; while Indian Oil Corporation has been the traditional downstream firm marketing the oil and gas products. Sharma wants to change that now, using a wholly owned subsidiary – Mangalore Refinery & Petrochemical Limited (MRPL).


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Friday, October 26, 2012

Relax! It ain’t a giant wave, not yet!

With two IPOs hitting its shores one can finally see some sign of life in the primary market again. But is the market really ready? manish k. pandey acts investor... oops investigator!

At least 50,000 retail investors applied for shares when Mahindra Holidays & Resorts came out with its initial public offering (IPO) in June this year, while the much awaited Adani Power IPO, which closed last week, received a whopping 5,79,000 applications (the Rs.30 billion IPO attracted total bids to the tune of Rs.650 billion). So the entire IPO ecosystem is buzzing with energy and enthusiasm yet again. Investors are seeing this as a chance to party again after a prolonged sobering period.

But then, is the market really ready for the next big wave of IPOs considering that the retail investor is still sceptical to investing in IPOs after the failure of Reliance Power IPO? “Capital markets have short memories. They have the habit of forgiving and forgetting the losses quickly as soon as they start making money again. Investor response to the Adani Power IPO is a case in the point after the fiasco of Reliance Power IPO. Certainly, investors are back into the IPO arena and it’s business-as-usual for them,” reasons Jagannadham Thunuguntla, CEO and Equity Head, SMC Capitals.

Further, the participation of retail investors in an IPO depends primarily upon two factors. Firstly, on the valuations at which the IPO is being made available to investors and secondly, on the state of the market at the time of the IPO (which has a bearing on investor sentiments). If these two factors are in favour, there is little doubt about the success of an IPO. But are these two factors really in favour of the investor as of today? “I believe that the market is ready for quality IPOs. With the return of the risk appetite amongst the investor community at large, there is certainly a demand for newer IPOs. However, to ensure that investor appetite remains unaffected, it’s important that these IPOs are not bunched together within a short span of time,” cautions Hitesh Agrawal, Head – Research, Angel Broking.
 

Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face