Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Book Review :The Test of My Life

The art of bouncing back

An autobiography cast in the classic tale-of-survival-against-all-odd mould, The Test of My Life reinforces the commonly held belief that it is only in life-threatening adversity that the true character of an individual shines through. In Yuvraj Singh’s case, it certainly did.

As Indian sport’s most high-profile cancer survivor, Yuvraj has a story that is at once poignant and inspirational. In this book “about my life before cancer, with cancer, and my life after it”, the cricketer is as candid as any public figure can afford to be in this era of 24x7 television channels lying in wait in the shadows to pounce upon any piece of information deemed salacious, saleable or lachrymal enough for shrill, relentless exploitation on the airwaves.

Yuvraj narrates his story straight from the heart, bringing out the innermost details of an intense fight that was fraught with doubts and fears, but one that, happily, ended in triumph. Cancer had threatened to derail more than just his career months after the most memorable moment of his life – the 2011 World Cup victory rendered doubly sweet by his bagging the Player of the Tournament prize. It was a distressing interlude that he had seen coming as he played the tournament in much pain and discomfort.

The rest of that year “vanished” from his life as he went in for treatment in the US and struggled to make it back to the sport that had made him what he was. This book is a bid to ensure that the time that went by in an agonising blur isn’t wasted. “Just as we share our victories and joys, we need to share our grief so someone else can feel they are not alone when the chips are down,” Yuvraj writes.   

For this reviewer, The Test of My Life: From Cricket to Cancer and Back, co-authored by sports scribes Sharda Ugra and Nishant Jeet Arora, works primarily because it is marked by journalistic directness. Although the ever-flamboyant middle-order batsman has let on that the story might take the form of a movie soon, this book, mercifully, isn’t a screenwriter’s take on Yuvraj’s brush with cancer. You feel the force of the ‘real’ battle that the cricketer waged to come out of the ordeal. It is told simply, without undue dramatic layering. Sentiments flow naturally from the innards of the tale.

Cancer seems to have made the once-brash and reckless young man a bit of a philosopher. He remembers the occasion when, as a boy, he crashed his new bicycle into a rickshaw. He did not know how to ride the bike but wanted to “master the machine on my own”. The result, he recalls, was “a spectacular accident, made up of a pinch of foolishness and plenty of blood”. Ten stitches were needed to repair two of his fingers.

Yuvraj then writes: “When I pull on my gloves now, I can still see the scars. The stitches remind me that balance is always a hard thing to master. Balance wasn’t part of the way I grew up and it is not part of Indian cricket either. Being accident-prone got me used to getting up and dusting myself off without fuss.”

While the cancer story is obviously at the heart of this readable book, it is also noteworthy for the frankness with which Yuvraj dwells upon the paternal pressures that he faced in childhood as his dad, Yograj Singh, who played one Test match and six ODIs for India, sought to make good his own failings through his son.

Always fond of all kinds of sporting pursuits, Yuvraj was more into skating than anything else, but his father literally forced him into cricket with such disregard for the boy’s own choices that the game “became a chore”.

He confesses that “even as a teenager, there were times I felt I was living my father’s life, chasing his dreams”. Now, many years later, he is of course able to see his father’s exertions with greater equanimity.

Yuvraj also looks back at his parents’ failed marriage with just as much honesty and empathy that he brings to bear upon the rest of his remarkable story. His mother was 18 and his dad 22 when they got married. Yuvraj was born a year later. The couple grew up and apart as life progressed, and Yuvraj and his brother, Zorawar, eight years younger, bore the brunt of the turmoil at home.

Yuvraj’s mental toughness, tenacity and sterling successes as a cricketer can, in part at least, be attributed to the many challenges that he countenanced in his formative years. It probably put some steel into his soul: the deeply ingrained mettle would have come in handy when cancer struck.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
2012 : DNA National B-School Survey 2012
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall

Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
BBA Management Education

SC verdict boon for poor

Glivec sold by MNC Novartis for Rs 1.2 lakhs will now be available for Rs 8,000

Gopal is affected by Cronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML), a blood cancer. His annual treatment at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) will cost anywhere between Rs 10 to 40 lakhs and will certainly add to his life. Wonder drug Glivec will make it possible.

But the sad part is Glivec’s astronomically high price - a burden for a majority of three lakh CML patients in India. The Swiss drug giant justifies it on account of its $1 billion investment into the research of the molecule. Such tall claims by multinational companies (MNCs) have been refuted by the Public Health Foundation which says that MNCs are overstating their investment to make heavy profits. In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court ruled out a plea filed by Novartis for patenting this anti-cancer drug Glivec, saying, ``there is no novelty, no invention’’. Novartis’ claim for patent was earlier rejected by the Indian Patent Appellate Board (IPAB), after which the MNC had moved the apex court.

The overall implication of this judgment is this: Glivec which is sold by Novartis for Rs 1.2 lakhs, will be available for Rs 8,000 to patients marketed by Glenmark, an Indian generic producer. The decision has come as a great relief to patients, generic drug manufacturers like Cipla, Ranbaxy, GlenMark etc and bad news for MNCs who thrive on exclusive marketing like Pfizer, Glaxo Smith Kline, Novartis and Aventis.

This historical development underlines a stark reality: Indian judicial and quasi-judicial bodies will not allow MNCs to exploit the 2005 April amendment of the Indian Patent Act which provides them exclusive marketing rights for 20 years, provided the drug is a new invention. The 2005 amendment was in tune with global practices as dictated by the World Trade Organisation (WTO).  Needless to add, the process patent regime of the Patent Act 1970 has been made redundant. But law makers did provide enough teeth in the act to stop ever greening - which means extending the patents duration by minor modulations in the molecule. The Supreme Court did use this particular legal provision in this case.

The MNC pharma body, Organization of Pharmaceutical Producers of India (OPPI) spokesman reacted strongly saying that India is discouraging invention and research. He also pointed out that MNCs not getting their due may shun this country. On the face, it is a commercially motivated propaganda to pressurise India. What are the points of rebuttal? One, this molecule was not new and existed in the public domain the world over and tried to enter India after 2005 to take advantage of the changed patent regime; two, Indians have walked the extra mile for promoting genuine inventions in 2005; three, the threat to India rings hollow because the sheer size of the Indian market will force the MNCs to adjust accordingly.  

The bottom line here is not recovering costs incurred in research but the greed for big money. Pharma products are killing poor people. Even the world’s most developed country USA, has resorted to generic drugs, saving roughly $ 1 trillion in health care.  There is a similar clamour in the European Union (EU). To handle this dire situation, a compulsory licensing (CL) clause was added to Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS ).

Cynics may argue otherwise but the fact is India has used this so-called death warrant (CL) only once while it has been often resorted to by the USA, Canada, China, Indonesia and Malaysia. In a bid to provide for affordable kidney anti-cancer drug Nexavar, the IPAB upheld the CL in favour of Natco Pharma against MNC Bayer, the original patent holder. Natco Pharma reduced Nexavar prices by 97 percent although they were asked to pay 6 percent royalty to Bayer. Remember Bayer was granted the patent in 2008 but exorbitant prices became unaffordable for cancer patients. Hence a fourth CL was granted in 2011. In contrast, US Presidents through executive orders have invoked CL time and again to sort out issues of shortages and affordability. Interestingly, the executive order of the US President cannot be challenged in court. What is the way out?  In case of essential and life saving drugs, governments, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and Unicef can join hands to promote research in the larger interest of humankind, something like the Gene Pool research where the USA and UK have joined hands.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
2012 : DNA National B-School Survey 2012
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall

Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
BBA Management Education

Monday, June 3, 2013

Movie Review: The Master

Dreg and dodd

Paul Thomas Anderson is a genius. With films such as There Will Be Blood, Magnolia, Boogie Nights, he has already established himself as one of the best directors of his generation. Now with The Master he returns to prove what movies are truly capable of.

A World War II veteran, Freddie Quell (Joaquin Phoenix), returns after the end of the war, sex-obsessed and alcoholic, trying his best to adapt to his new environment. He stumbles and bumbles his way to the yacht of Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman), the leader of a cultish philosophical movement called “The Cause.” After going through some “processing” techniques with Dodd, Freddie becomes a hardy supporter of

“The Cause” and violently takes care of some of its detractors.

Joaquin Phoenix plays the character of Freddie with a raw, exposed nerve. He drives the film with mixes of humour and determination and a never ending novelty. Freddie is as untameable and unpredictable as the film itself.

The Master does not shy away from anything. Whether showing the sex-obsessed imagination of Freddie or exposing the practices of the sham religion which Lancaster Dodd preaches, which is creepingly similar to Scientology, the film never does all the explaining. It ties together some deeply contemplate-able thoughts about war, humanity, religion, love, authority and belief and leaves you to ponder about it.

If you still doubt that cinema is the most powerful medium of expression, The Master will make you believe it.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman

ExecutiveMBA

Saturday, June 1, 2013

The India v/s bharat test

Indian cricket is symbolic of the struggle going on between the big city English speaking elite who prefer status quo and small town apsirants who want change

If I am not mistaken, it happened in 1984, arguably one of the most tumultuous and violent years in the history of independent India. Soon after winning the cricket World Cup in 1983, the Indian team led by the small town-broken English Kapil Dev was thrashed and humiliated by a rampaging West Indies team bent on vengeance for the World Cup loss. Predictably, Kapil lost his captaincy to the big city-flawless English Sunil Gavaskar. Subsequently, India lost a test match in Delhi to a visiting England team. Some people blamed Kapil for playing an "irresponsible" shot and getting out. The selectors and the captain Gavaskar dropped Kapil from the next Test to be played at Eden Gardens in then Calcutta. All hell broke loose and conspiracy theories started flying thick and fast. Just imagine what would have happened if we had dozens of 24X7 news channels back then! Cricket fans at Eden Gardens responded by hooting, booing and shellacking Sunil Gavaskar.

What, you may ask, is the relevance of this slice of history to the controversy over Virender Sehwag? Well, the fact is that the battle between Bharat and India as symbolized by the Indian cricket team is decades old and will not end with the axing of Sehwag. Just like Kapil Dev, Sehwag is raw and unvarnished talent that often refuses to play by the rule book. Like Kapil, Sehwag is not comfortable with English and yet has an uncanny ability to score runs, take wickets and yes, earn a lot of money. Like Kapil, Sehwag has been often slammed for his unconventional and "irresponsible" ways. Both represent the gradual but sure emergence of the small town India that is in a hurry to destroy the existing citadels of elitism that English-speaking India has so carefully nurtured. Soon after he retired, Sunil Gavaskar became a commentator on the idiot box and remains so. Soon after he retired, Kapil Dev tried becoming a commentator on English sports channels. It was embarrassing and he dropped out. But Bharat will have its way, no matter what India thinks and wants. So, the Star Network now has two channels devoted to Test and one day cricket in India. Gavaskar is the star in the English one and Kapil is the star in the Hindi one. It is a rare Navjot Singh Sidhu who can straddle both language channels with effortless verbosity. When Sehwag finally drops his swashbuckling cricket bat and decides to sit in front of a microphone, you know in which language he will be delivering commentary.

Who knows, Sehwag, like Kapil before him will do a thing or two that might anger both the Establishment and the cricket Establishment. Surely you must remember the genesis of the IPL? Well, it owes its birth and success to two small town Indians named Subhash  Chandra and Kapil Dev. The promotor of the Zee Network Chandra was so frustrated by the BCCI repeatedly refusing to give telecast rights to his channels that he launched the Indian Cricket League and appointed Kapil Dev as the CEO. A number of has-been and wannabe players were signed up to play 20 over matches. The BCCI struck back with a vengeance and basically told players that anyone playing in ICL will incur the wrath of the Establishment. In a brazen show of pettiness that only English speaking elitist India is capable of, the BCCI even stopped the pension it was paying to Kapil Dev. And of course, it created and launched the IPL, now the centre of allegations of money laundering and what not.  

Quite ironically, it is two fluent in English elitist cricketers who have promoted the rise and rise of small town talent and an an in-your-face take-no-losses attitude. The first was the late MAK Pataudi, a blue-blooded royal who could have played Test cricket for England if he wanted to. He constantly battled against the Establishment and encouraged 'rebel' players like Erapalli Prasanna. His last comeback is the stuff of legend. In 1975, India had already lost two consecutive Test matches to a visiting West Indies team. The two Tests had incidentally heralded the arrival ot the global stage of the now legendary Viv Richards. Public outcry and demand forced the selectors to appoint Pataudi as the captain. He delivered two successive test victories in then Calcutta and Madras. The other elitist who has encouraged small town Bharat is Sourav Ganguly. Indian cricket was in a shambles when Ganguly was made the captain in the wake of the match mixing scam and a series of humiliating defeats under Sachin Tendulkar as captain. And he created magic with the help of small town wonders like Zaheer Khan, Harbhajan Singh, Mohammed Kaif, Virender Sehwag and Irfan Pathan. Do remember, thanks to his efforts, Pataudi was always given a raw deal by the Establishment. And the manner in which India's most successful captain Ganguly was humiliated is sordid.

So will this battle between small town Bharat and big city India ever end? Not in a hurry. India represents status quo and the cosy comforts and benefits that naturally come your way when you belong to the club. Bharat finds entry into this club very difficult. And only huge success, performance and talent apart from the ability to break rules allows the English speaking Establishment to grudgingly accept it.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
2012 : DNA National B-School Survey 2012
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall

Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
BBA Management Education